ScienceAccessibility issueshttps://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues2020-04-19T05:11:37Zhttps://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/30Make Buildable without explicit Docker building.2020-04-19T05:11:37ZRussell JarvisMake Buildable without explicit Docker building.*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Move code from here into this repository.
https://github.com/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccess
Especially requirements.txt and .travis.yml
The goal is that that the whole project should be buildable without ...*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Move code from here into this repository.
https://github.com/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccess
Especially requirements.txt and .travis.yml
The goal is that that the whole project should be buildable without using Docker explicitly.
Docker2repo can build and host on mybinder.
Voila can convert the notebook to a dynamic web page.https://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/29Link to scraping backend with a plotly-dash front end.2019-12-05T00:35:28ZRussell JarvisLink to scraping backend with a plotly-dash front end.*Created by: russelljjarvis*
https://community.plot.ly/t/type-in-field-click-submit-long-computation-done-in-serial-returns-data-frame-data-frame-plotted-as-histograms/32078
https://github.com/waralex/Dashboards.jl
import Pkg; Pkg...*Created by: russelljjarvis*
https://community.plot.ly/t/type-in-field-click-submit-long-computation-done-in-serial-returns-data-frame-data-frame-plotted-as-histograms/32078
https://github.com/waralex/Dashboards.jl
import Pkg; Pkg.add(Pkg.PackageSpec(url = "https://github.com/waralex/Dashboards.jl.git"))https://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/28Workflow needs external validation2019-11-18T01:00:44ZRussell JarvisWorkflow needs external validation*Created by: russelljjarvis*
@mcgurrgurr
https://github.com/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/blob/master/Documentation/DevelopingFrontEnd.MD*Created by: russelljjarvis*
@mcgurrgurr
https://github.com/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/blob/master/Documentation/DevelopingFrontEnd.MDhttps://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/27Issues2019-10-31T03:21:54ZRussell JarvisIssues*Created by: russelljjarvis*
@mcgurrgurr
1. Maybe connecting plots one and two so they pop up together in one window as subplots. In the same window mainly for convenience of review more than anything.
3. Any other final co...*Created by: russelljjarvis*
@mcgurrgurr
1. Maybe connecting plots one and two so they pop up together in one window as subplots. In the same window mainly for convenience of review more than anything.
3. Any other final coding steps to ensure robustness and usability. I’m not sure what this means, but basically feeling ok about the code being seen and used that nothing odd will come out of it.
https://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/13Create software diagram2019-02-05T02:22:00ZRussell JarvisCreate software diagram*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Easy first issue.*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Easy first issue.https://git.qoto.org/russelljjarvis/ScienceAccessibility/-/issues/8WComplexity application Web based 'leaderboard' of simple academic writing co...2019-07-15T03:09:44ZRussell JarvisWComplexity application Web based 'leaderboard' of simple academic writing competition.*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Hi WCTeam
I realized that one cool application of the WC project could be to try to foster competition between scientific writers. It's possible to use WC metrics to evaluate present and scientific writin...*Created by: russelljjarvis*
Hi WCTeam
I realized that one cool application of the WC project could be to try to foster competition between scientific writers. It's possible to use WC metrics to evaluate present and scientific writings. Some other fields are advocating for such competitions in order to promote best practices.
To this end, I mined my PI and co-PI on Google Scholar citations and compared them to two benchmark references: 'The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time', and the 'http://splasho.com/upgoer5/library.php' xkcd upgoer5 editor library corpus (it only permits 10,000 of the most common English words). For good measure, I also added in one of Peter Marting's recent publication abstracts.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=GzG5kRAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xnsDhO4AAAAJ&hl=en&oe=ASCII&oi=sra
[Results down bottom.](https://github.com/russelljjarvis/WordComplexityPython/blob/dev/Examples/Incentivise_by_competing.ipynb)
I then [scored](https://github.com/russelljjarvis/WordComplexityPython/blob/dev/Examples/compete.py#L96) all 5 authors, based on a metric, that takes into account: reading grade level, concision/redundancy, and objectivity.
The competition results confirmed a priori beliefs about text quality: 'The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time' came first, the upgoer5 library came second, and then there marginal differences between Rick and Sharon as they are co-authors, however Sharon beat Rick. Peter came last, and I am not sure why that is.
I also felt like the limited vocabulary of upgoer5 might harm concision as it may need more simple words to convey the same information, so I also made a metric based on the ratio of unique words, to text word length.
Let me know if either of you guys have any resource links for authors and content that you think should join the competition.
The same metric might do a good job at identifying texts of high quality that are mined with the original broad search [queries](https://github.com/russelljjarvis/WordComplexityPython/blob/dev/Examples/mined_ranked.ipynb):