From 32ecbd13c3719265b0e9cd70be5fc52ddf3ce29c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pmcg <34006725+mcgurrgurr@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:32:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update paper.md
---
paper.md | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/paper.md b/paper.md
index d9cb8e1..046ab01 100644
--- a/paper.md
+++ b/paper.md
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
title: 'Exploring the Readability of Scientific and Non-scientific Sources'
tags:
- -readability;
- -science communication;
- -science writing
+ - readability
+ - science communication
+ - science writing
-authors
+authors:
- name: Russell Jarvis
affiliation: PhD Candidate Neuroscience, Arizona State University
- name: Patrick McGurrin
@@ -94,3 +94,5 @@ The readability of ART Corpus is comparable to that of other scientific journals
While the Flesch-Kincaid readability score is the most common readability metric, including other metrics, such as information entropy, word length, and compression ratios, subjectivity, and reading ease scores, will serve to provide more robust feedback to the user with regard to the complexity and structure of their written text.
Finally, we believe that the idea public competition could be a fun and interactive way for scientists to improve their science communication skills, and believe there is room for expansion here as well.
+
+## References
--
GitLab