From c489438959fdadc8f2c5bb71304868d51cfa0021 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ravenci <134-ravenci@git.qoto.org> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:04:20 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix html formatting --- public/article/internet-in-general.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general.html b/public/article/internet-in-general.html index 68551a6..a5dbf41 100644 --- a/public/article/internet-in-general.html +++ b/public/article/internet-in-general.html @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ <p>I personally fine with obeying <strong><em>TOS</em></strong> and consenting with what type of <strong><em>information</em></strong> that might get collected by using an online service. Since in our personal life, we also bound to obey ethics, law, etc in order to be a good citizen (i personally against all kind of so called <em>"law"</em> since i hate being supressed. But hey! If most of the time it does help to prevent people to harm each other and it's environment. Why not ?)</p> <p>The only problem i had with this <em>"Data Collection"</em> is that</p> <p><strong>The lacks of well written "Data retention" policy on every single available service on the internet.</strong></p> -<p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</p> +<p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p> </li> <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2> <p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p> -- GitLab