diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general.html b/public/article/internet-in-general.html
index 68551a69ee083cdb9c7524d30534e881e4193ed1..a5dbf417ddf5f642ae5416c403e87dfc58d57e1f 100644
--- a/public/article/internet-in-general.html
+++ b/public/article/internet-in-general.html
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 <p>I personally fine with obeying <strong><em>TOS</em></strong> and consenting with what type of <strong><em>information</em></strong> that might get collected by using an online service. Since in our personal life, we also bound to obey ethics, law, etc in order to be a good citizen (i personally against all kind of so called <em>"law"</em> since i hate being supressed. But hey! If most of the time it does help to prevent people to harm each other and it's environment. Why not ?)</p>
 <p>The only problem i had with this <em>"Data Collection"</em> is that</p>
 <p><strong>The lacks of well written "Data retention" policy on every single available service on the internet.</strong></p>
-<p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</p>
+<p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p>
 </li>
 <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2>
 <p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p>