From 65a21955b4fb6855a6c472db1a24031f4ec26dd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ravenci <134-ravenci@git.qoto.org> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:09:09 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] add a bit of formatting --- public/article/indexdark.html | 2 +- public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html | 8 ++++---- public/article/internet-in-general.html | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/public/article/indexdark.html b/public/article/indexdark.html index b1cc2ce..9200b4c 100644 --- a/public/article/indexdark.html +++ b/public/article/indexdark.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ </head> <body> <ul> -<li><a href="internet-in-general.html">internet in general</a></li> +<li><a href="internet-in-general-dark.html">internet in general</a></li> </ul> </body> <footer> diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html b/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html index 7abe3be..dc74a56 100644 --- a/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html +++ b/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ <head> <meta charset= "utf-8"> <title>Personal opinion about internet in general</title> -<link rel='stylesheet' href="../stylesdark.css"/> -<p><a href="internet-in-general.html">Toggle dark mode</a></p> +<link rel='stylesheet' href="../styles.css"/> +<p><a href="internet-in-general-dark.html">Toggle dark mode</a></p> </head> <body> <h1>Personal Opinion Regarding Internet In general</h1> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ <p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p> </li> <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2> -<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p> -<p>Take automatic telemetry or crash report for example. You maybe could tell if your software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em>reverse-engineer</em>every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> +<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means <strong>"we"</strong> as an <strong>"user"</strong> couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> it like a boss, <em>unfortunately</em> not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad).</p> +<p>Take <strong>automatic telemetry</strong> or <strong>crash report</strong> for example. You <em>maybe</em> could tell if your installed software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> <p>Again unless you (software developer & online service owner) could provide an audit report regarding how <em>secure</em> your system is. You shouldn't hide your source code</p> </li> </ul> diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general.html b/public/article/internet-in-general.html index a5dbf41..dc74a56 100644 --- a/public/article/internet-in-general.html +++ b/public/article/internet-in-general.html @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ <p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p> </li> <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2> -<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p> -<p>Take automatic telemetry or crash report for example. You maybe could tell if your software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em>reverse-engineer</em>every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> +<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means <strong>"we"</strong> as an <strong>"user"</strong> couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> it like a boss, <em>unfortunately</em> not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad).</p> +<p>Take <strong>automatic telemetry</strong> or <strong>crash report</strong> for example. You <em>maybe</em> could tell if your installed software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> <p>Again unless you (software developer & online service owner) could provide an audit report regarding how <em>secure</em> your system is. You shouldn't hide your source code</p> </li> </ul> -- GitLab