diff --git a/public/article/indexdark.html b/public/article/indexdark.html index b1cc2ce3bfd915fe565f099c019a750814c9425e..9200b4c027a05876e396719a91ec9ff8ff9bccf3 100644 --- a/public/article/indexdark.html +++ b/public/article/indexdark.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ </head> <body> <ul> -<li><a href="internet-in-general.html">internet in general</a></li> +<li><a href="internet-in-general-dark.html">internet in general</a></li> </ul> </body> <footer> diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html b/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html index 7abe3be098c8a35d8ad8fa2e74dfe59537ee2b73..dc74a56d4e2458e33b6202f6adf0dfa91d13961a 100644 --- a/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html +++ b/public/article/internet-in-general-dark.html @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ <head> <meta charset= "utf-8"> <title>Personal opinion about internet in general</title> -<link rel='stylesheet' href="../stylesdark.css"/> -<p><a href="internet-in-general.html">Toggle dark mode</a></p> +<link rel='stylesheet' href="../styles.css"/> +<p><a href="internet-in-general-dark.html">Toggle dark mode</a></p> </head> <body> <h1>Personal Opinion Regarding Internet In general</h1> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ <p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p> </li> <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2> -<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p> -<p>Take automatic telemetry or crash report for example. You maybe could tell if your software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em>reverse-engineer</em>every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> +<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means <strong>"we"</strong> as an <strong>"user"</strong> couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> it like a boss, <em>unfortunately</em> not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad).</p> +<p>Take <strong>automatic telemetry</strong> or <strong>crash report</strong> for example. You <em>maybe</em> could tell if your installed software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> <p>Again unless you (software developer & online service owner) could provide an audit report regarding how <em>secure</em> your system is. You shouldn't hide your source code</p> </li> </ul> diff --git a/public/article/internet-in-general.html b/public/article/internet-in-general.html index a5dbf417ddf5f642ae5416c403e87dfc58d57e1f..dc74a56d4e2458e33b6202f6adf0dfa91d13961a 100644 --- a/public/article/internet-in-general.html +++ b/public/article/internet-in-general.html @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ <p>Why ? you may ask. Well, simply because i don't trust a corporation potentially store my personal information permanently on their server, <em>unless</em> they could provide an audit report from an external organization regarding how secure their system is. Until then <strong>Please provide a better and easily understandable "Data Retention" policy!</strong></p> </li> <li><h2>Closed source is the dumbest thing i've ever heard</h2> -<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means "we" as an "user" couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em>reverse-engineer</em> it like a boss, unfortunately not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad)</p> -<p>Take automatic telemetry or crash report for example. You maybe could tell if your software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em>reverse-engineer</em>every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> +<p>Yeah. You heard that right. The lacks of source means <strong>"we"</strong> as an <strong>"user"</strong> couldn't do an audit for what might and what does get collected by those software owner. Sure you might <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> it like a boss, <em>unfortunately</em> not everyone does that. (which is a bit sad).</p> +<p>Take <strong>automatic telemetry</strong> or <strong>crash report</strong> for example. You <em>maybe</em> could tell if your installed software sending an internet traffic to site <strong>A</strong> if you did <em><strong>reverse-engineer</strong></em> every software that you used. You could possibly add a firewall to prevent that internet traffic to reach the intended destination, you could do a packet capture and see what's inside, But if it's encrypted you'll never know what could possibly get collected</p> <p>Again unless you (software developer & online service owner) could provide an audit report regarding how <em>secure</em> your system is. You shouldn't hide your source code</p> </li> </ul>